Is there a correlation between the
introduction of HFCS and the rise
of obesity in the past 30 years?
Many factors contribute to the development of obesity, yet
nutritionists, health experts and researchers generally agree
that the chief cause is an imbalance between calories
consumed and calories burned. Excessive calories can be
consumed as fats, proteins, alcohol or carbohydrates. The
American Dietetic Association notes, “Excess body fat
[obesity] arises from the energy imbalance caused by taking
in too much energy and expending too little energy...Obesity
is a complex problem and its cause cannot be simply attributed to any one component of the food supply such as
sweeteners.” (7)
Further, the prevalence of obesity is increasing around the
world, according to the International Obesity Task Force—
even though use of HFCS outside of the United States is
limited or nonexistent.8 In fact, sugar accounts for about 92
percent of caloric sweeteners consumed worldwide. (9)
Scientific studies continue to find that HFCS does not
contribute to obesity any differently than sugar.
An expert panel, led by Richard Forshee, Ph.D. of the
University of Maryland Center for Food, Nutrition and
Agriculture Policy, concluded that “the currently available
evidence is insufficient to implicate HFCS per se as a causal
factor in the overweight and obesity problem in the United
States.” The panel’s report was published in the August 2007
issue of Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. (10)
The report found that there are many other “plausible
explanations for rising overweight and obesity rates” in the
United States, listing such factors as “a decrease in smoking;
an increase in sedentary occupations; an increase in twoincome
households and single-parent households;
transportation and infrastructure changes that discourage
physical activity; a decrease in PE classes and extracurricular
sports programs in schools; an increase in sedentary forms
of entertainment (i.e. TV/movie viewing, video games, etc.);
demographic changes (i.e. aging population, immigration,
etc.); a decrease in food costs with increase in food availability;
and changes in food consumption patterns.”
Another peer-reviewed study has found that those who
frequently consume sweetened soft drinks do not have a
higher obesity rate than those who rarely drink them. The
study found higher obesity rates correlated with several other
factors, such as the amount of time in front of the computer
or TV, or the consumption of high amounts of dietary fat. (11)
Further, the November/December 2005 issue of Nutrition
Today includes a report from the Center for Food, Nutrition
and Agriculture Policy and its Ceres Workshop, which was
compiled by scientists who reviewed a number of critical
commentaries about HFCS. Their analysis found that HFCS
is not a unique contributor to obesity, concluding “there is
currently no convincing evidence to support a link between
HFCS consumption and overweight/obesity.” (12)
Home Top
|